Saving the US Economy – Effective Involvement of Government and Business

The rapid development of the Asian economieschallenging. To the Obama administration's credit,
provides numerous examples of methods tostimulus funds have been provided to support
develop job growth, incubate new technologieshigh-tech battery production.
and new products, scale-up to production andAdversion to risk may be another problem
manufacture of the new product, and develop acompanies face. Foreign governments often
strong economy. In a study of the industrialmitigate the risk of companies through
development of East Asia, Robert Wade in hisgovernment funding. The scaling and
book Governing the Market: Economic Theory andmanufacturing process is very costly and can be
the Role of Government in East Asianvery risky. The investments required are much
Industrialization found that Asian economieshigher than in the invention phase. And funds need
performed at record numbers over the 1970sto be committed early, when not much is known
and 1980s in large part because of the effectiveabout the potential market. As Dr. Grove from
involvement of the government in targeting theIntel points out: The investment to build a silicon
growth of manufacturing industries. As Tom Blair,manufacturing plant in the 1970s was a few million
in his book Poorer Richard's America: What Woulddollars. By the early 1990s, the cost had risen to
Ben Franklin Say?, "the government of Chinaseveral billion dollars. The decision in the 1990s to
spends their money to build industry and sellbuild the plants for the Pentium chips needed to
products, and the USA spends money to makebe made years before Intel knew whether the
the world safe." If the USA wants to continue toPentium chip would work or whether the market
be the world's superpower and leader for peace,would be interested in it. Because of good
and indeed we should, for think about the worldtechnology and good business decisions, along with
rife with tyrannical governments and militaristicacceptance of the associated risks, the Pentium
groups causing anarchy, killing, raping, and torturingwas a huge success.
if we are not there to lead, then we must regainHowever, in previous years, when Intel's business
our economic might in order to support our worldfocused on making memory chips, Intel hesitated
leadership role.to add manufacturing capacity, not being sure
Consider the USA where recently the mantra hasabout the market demand in years to come.
been "free market" and the US governmentJapanese competitors didn't hesitate and invested
viewed as "the problem." Not long ago in California,in the plants. When the demand for memory chips
and in particular the Silicon Valley, the mostrose exponentially, the Japanese roared into the
dynamic economy on the planet was in place,U.S. market and Intel began its descent as a
thanks, partly, to local, state, and federalmemory-chip supplier.
government, where a tremendous incubation ofNow in even in our biotech and pharmaceutical
new companies and new technologies wasbusiness we see some of the same trends
occurring. Those companies went on to produceemerging. The biotech revolution began in the
their products in California, realizing great jobSilicon Valley area, South San Francisco to be
growth and bolstering the economy. Theprecise, at Genentech.  The biotech industry
birthplace of semiconductors and biotechnology,flourished in the Bay Area and along the California
this area has thrived with the incubation and thenCoast especially north of Los Angeles where
the scale-up to production and manufacturing ofAmgen became the world's largest biotech
new technologies. Seated next to one of thecompany, and also in San Diego where over 500
world's wealthiest communities with muchbiotech companies now exist, including such
disposable income, packed with venture capitalist,promising new start-ups as Craig Venter's
ringed by three of the great universities on theSynthetic Genomics that has partnered with
planet (UC Berkeley, Stanford, and UCSF), andExxon-Mobil to produce algal biofuels. However,
many other institutes providing a vast quantity ofmany of the active ingredients or raw materials
intellectual assets and intellectual property, loadedfor biotech and pharmaceutical products are being
with entrepreneurs, supported by federal dollars,outsourced to companies in India and China,
and even supported by state initiatives such assometimes with disastrous consequences beyond
the 1980s California Commission on Industrialthe economic implications. Witness the deaths of
Innovation instituted by then Governor Jerry81 people from the drug heparin produced in
Brown ( a noted fiscal conservative, butChina. Investigations found a contaminant,
proponent of high-tech industry and education),over-sulfated chondroitin sulfate, tainting raw
the Silicon Valley has long been the champion ofheparin coming from China that was linked to the
the world economy.deaths. Along with India, China supplies more than
However, something is changing and the change is40 percent of the active pharmaceutical
not good. Iconic to this change, witness where theingredients (API) used to make U.S.
birth of the world's first silicon chip happened inpharmaceuticals. And Pfizer and Johnson &
Mountain View, CA, where now that seminal siteJohnson have announced plans to set-up research
of the chip industry is a nice place to pick upand development facilities in China. Again, technical
some fresh produce. This produce stand onceknowhow and innovation are being exported
was the world's first semiconductor lab,overseas, with long-term economic consequences,
established by the American physicist Williamas well as the killing and sickening of people
Shockley and where the founders of Fairchild andbecause of poor quality control overseas.
Intel first worked. However, nowadays just aWhy is the US no longer interested in scaling up
couple of marks on the sidewalk indicate ato production? Perhaps the answer has to do with
glorious past of America's chip making industry,a general undervaluing of manufacturing, and the
among all the fruits and veggies.idea that as long as innovation process stays in
Unemployment in the Bay Area is about 10%,the U.S., all will be well with our economy. This
which is higher than the national average. Clearly,way of thinking seems wide spread.
the great Silicon Valley innovation machine hasn'tPrinceton University economist Alan S. Blinder in
been creating many jobs lately in the USA.Offshoring of American Jobs by Bhagwati and
Instead, those jobs are headed to Asia.Blinder have written: "The TV manufacturing
The underlying problem isn't simply lower costs inindustry really started here, and at one point
Asia. Rather we face a number of problems thatemployed many workers. But as TV sets
are self-inflicted.  To paraphrase Tom Blair,became ‘just a commodity,' their production
American companies eat their young, often for amoved offshore to locations with much lower
few years of heightened profits, then theywages. And nowadays the number of television
disclose and transfer their expertise andsets manufactured in the U.S. is zero. A failure?
technologies to China. Another words, we giveNo, a success."
away our know-how and hence the long-termThe overseas production of TVs not only caused
survivability of our US companies for the sake ofa loss of jobs, but also broke the chain of
several years increased income for the shortexperience that is so important in technological
term gain of entry into the Chinese market.evolution. Just as happened when the US
Further, we have our own misguided belief in theabandoned the production of batteries, abandoning
power of startups alone to create newtoday's "commodity" manufacturing may very
technologies and U.S. jobs. Americans love thewell lock the US out of tomorrow's emerging
idea of the guys in the garage inventingindustries.
something that changes the world. We all think ofAgain, the economic mantra of today seems to
the Apple Computer start-up in a garagebe "free market is best, and government is the
somewhere in Northern California back in the 70sproblem." Such fundamental beliefs that have
or the more recent version of Google with abeen elevated from a conviction based on
beautiful campus where innovation runs rampant.observation and reasoning to an unquestioned
Often I hear businessmen espouse the view thattruism are leading us down an uncompetitive path.
we are living in a country where we create ideasIn the past we have seen the decisive victory of
but not products, and this is exactly what the USfree-market principles over planned economies.
should be doing. Recently New York TimesWe now ignore the role of government in what in
columnist Thomas L. Friedman in an opinion piecereality was controlled capitalism, largely oblivious to
called "Start-Ups, Not Bailouts," pointed to ouremerging evidence that while free markets beat
significant economic problems in the USA resultingplanned economies, totally free markets have
from a combination of problems, including anever worked well and we must consider
deteriorating educational system, lack of a healthymodified capitalism as a system that works even
political and governmental atmosphere, andbetter than free markets.
immigration policies that turn away "high-IQ riskEvidence of government working through a
takers," leading to a diminution of entrepreneurialcontrolled free market to develop economies and
activities and thus the creation of new businessesadvance innovation, jobs, and a strong industry
and new technologies.presence is observed in several Asian countries
Startups are important for our economy, but also,during the past few decades. These countries
as Dr. Andy Grove of Intel will argue, start-upseem to understand that job creation and building
activity alone, where products are conceived butindustry must be the No. 1 objective of state
without the subsequent scale-up to production, willeconomic policy. The government plays a
lead to a less than robust economy and erode jobstrategic role in setting the priorities and arraying
growth, and eventually diminish further innovativethe forces and organization necessary to achieve
start-up activity. Yes, I have argued in front ofthis goal.
congress to back start-ups with loan and SBIROne example is the "Golden Projects," a series of
programs, and support of our great researchseven digital initiatives devised and managed by
universities, but start-ups alone without scale-upthe Chinese government in the late 1980s and
to production and development of the technology1990s. Beijing was convinced of the importance of
and products here in the USA cannot byelectronic networks that are used for
themselves increase tech employment and sustaintransactions, communications and coordination in
an innovation-based economy. Equally important isenabling job creation and economic growth,
what comes after that moment of creation in theparticularly in the less developed parts of the
garage, as technology goes from prototype tocountry. Over time, the Golden Projects
mass production. This is the phase wherecontributed to the rapid development of China's
companies "scale- up," a process whereby theinformation infrastructure, job creation, and the
employees work out design details, figure outcountry's economic growth.
how to build their products affordably, buildWhat do we learn from the Asian experience?
factories and infrastructure, develop businessFirst, let's remember that government has had
partnerships often with other local businesses, andmuch to do with our success as a nation and our
where management hires people by thecontinued success will depend on a strong
thousands. Scaling is hard work and, in the eyesgovernment that attracts the best minds. As an
of Americans, maybe not as glamorous as theexample in the great success of California, the US
innovation process, but is necessary for innovationgovernment helped establish important institutions
to be realized in a commercial product, and equallyfor research and teaching including the University
important, is necessary for further innovation.of California through the university land grant
The scaling-up process and manufacturing is nowsystem in the 1880s,and established the
rarely occurring in the U.S, and as we fail to doLivermore National Labs with the University of
our own manufacturing, plowing capital into youngCalifornia in 1952.  According to the
companies that build their factories elsewhere willSemiconductor Industry Association(SIA),
continue to yield a poor return in creating jobs in"Reversing the Decline in Federal Funding, In the
American, decrease economic gains in the USA,1990s, federal funding declined precipitously in the
lead to the eventual deterioration of innovation,areas most critical to our industry's continued
and fail to build a healthy economy with a robustsuccess: the physical sciences, mathematics, and
middle-class.engineering. This has seriously reduced the
In years past, scaling-up to production andnumber of faculty and students in these
manufacture worked well in the Silicon Valley.disciplines, slowing the pace of university research
Entrepreneurs invented something new and useful.and creating a shortage of skilled workers for our
Investors provided money to build the newcompanies. In the past year, SIA has energetically
business. If the founders and their investorsaddressed this problem."  Furthermore, in
developed good technology and business ideas,Business and Economic History (1995), Daniel
worked hard, and were lucky, the company grewHolbrook writes that the US government did
and had an initial public offering (IPO) that broughtmuch to develop the semiconductor industry in a
additional money to finance further growth.number of ways, including its procurement policies
Examples in the Valley are Intel, then Tandemand an ability to lead the dissemination of
Computers Inc. went through a similar processimportant technological developments to the
(was purchased by Compaq in 1997), then Sunindustry. Further, the birth of the biotech industry
Microsystems Inc., Apple, Cisco Systems Inc.,in California was largely a result from work at a
Netscape Communications Corp. (now a part ofnumber of great research universities, supported
AOL), and recently Google, Facebook, Twitter,by government, including the University of
and many others.California.
As time passed, wages and health-care costsViewing the Silicon Valley and the rest of the
rose in the U.S., and the Chinese governmentCalifornia tech industry, a community with a
devised a system to compete. Americanstrong tradition of science and engineering exists,
companies discovered they could have theirthis community is eager to solve whatever
manufacturing and even their engineering doneproblems they encounter. If profit margins are
cheaper overseas. Doing so improved thethe problem, the scientists and engineers work on
company's margins. Management and stockholdersmargins. Each company, independent and
were happy. Growth continued, and so didindividualistic, does its best to expand efficiently
profitably. But the long term results of suchand improve its own profitability. However, in
overseas outsourcing began to show and the jobpursuit of our individual businesses and a short
machine in the great Silicon Valley began to falter.term view to the yearly financial accounting goals,
Unfortunately, today, manufacturing employmentwhich often involves transferring manufacturing
in the U.S. computer industry is about 166,000,and a great deal of engineering out of the
which is lower than it was before the firstcountry, has hindered our ability to bring
personal computer, the MITS Altair 2800, wasinnovations and manufacturing at home, and has
assembled in 1975. Meanwhile, a very effectiveimperiled our economy. Without scaling to
computer-manufacturing industry has emerged inproduction and support of our educational and
Asia, employing about 1.5 million workers, includingresearch institutions, we don't just lose jobs, but
factory employees, engineers, and managers. Honwe lose our hold on new technologies and
Hai Precision Industry Co. of Taiwan is the largesteventually erode our economy.
of these Asian companies with revenue last yearOur current state of economic ills is partially due
of $62 billion, larger than Apple Inc., Microsoftto our short term goals to increase the bottom
Corp., Dell Inc. or Intel. Hon Hai Precision employsline of the financials and as a consequence of
more than 800,000 people, more than themany of us taking actions focused on our own
combined worldwide head count of Apple, Dell,companies' next milestones. In the biotech
Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard Co., Intel and Sonyindustry this is reflected by many companies
Corp. Indeed this is company making you I-Poddeveloping an "Indian" or "China" strategy to
and your I-Pad.move production or studies overseas because
The deterioration of US job creation is endemic totheir competitors are doing so already. And as the
much of US industry, not just in our computercompanies moved production or research
industry. Alternative energy is another example,overseas, they often found that the lower costs
where an emerging industry is replete with muchoverseas were really not so low when studies
innovation. Photovoltaics are a U.S. invention. Usewere not performed correctly and products were
of photovoltaics in home-energy applications wasdelivered late and/or were of inferior quality.  As
also pioneered by the U.S. Unfortunately, most ofDr. Andy Grove has suggested, companies and
the photovoltaic panels are now manufactured inVCs should have a partner in charge of every
China. Although a Silicon Valley technologycompany's "U.S. strategy."
company sells equipment that is used toTo better compete in the world economy, the US
manufacture photo-active films, the companywill need to view business in the long term as well
ships close to 10 times more machines to Chinaas the short term. Outsourcing overseas and
than to manufacturers in the U.S., and this gap isgiving away our scale to production for short
growing. Not surprisingly, U.S. employment in theterm profits needs a disincentive, thus rebuilding
making of photovoltaic films and panels is perhapsour industrial base. Government needs to support
10,000 -- just a few percent of estimatedour great research institutions, provide liquidity in
worldwide employment. New concentratingthe financial markets for all businesses, including
photovoltaic (CPV) systems were recentlystart-ups and small businesses, and should develop
invented in California, and hopefully this newa system of financial incentives, such as to levy a
technology will continue to develop in the USAtax on products produced offshore. Then use the
with companies such as SolFocus of Mountaindollars from this tax to provide liquid capital to
View, California.those companies creating innovative products in
And job creation is just a part of the problem.the USA and/or scaling their production within our
With some technologies originally developed in theborders. A government supported system such
USA, such as advanced batteries, both scaling-upas this would provide an incentive, and a reminder,
to production and innovation are occurringthat all of us in business have a responsibility to
overseas. Although years in the making,maintain the industrial base on which this country
mass-produced electric cars and trucks are finallyhas prospered and on which we depend for our
on the market. New companies are emerging inlong-term viability. Further, during our current
the USA, including Tesla in Northern California andeconomic crisis, allowing our great academic
Fisker in Southern California. These cars rely onresearch institutions to fall from their current lead
lithium-ion batteries. Unlike microprocessors, wherein science and engineering will lead to the eventual
many are produced in the Silicon Valley, Texas,decline of our great ability to innovate and
and the East Coast by Intel, AMD, and others, theincubate new technologies and new companies. To
U.S. share of lithium-ion battery production is small.accomplish this revitalization of our business,
The small presence of the USA in the productiongovernment will need to become less acerbic.
of high-tech batteries presents a problem forInstead of politics being played like American
growing this, and related industry in the USA. Afootball, where there are two competitors and
new industry needs an effective infrastructure inpeople choose one side or the other and defend
which technology knowhow accumulates,their side irrationally, politics need to be played
knowhow and innovation builds on experience, andrationally. Our current state of demagoguery
close relationships develop between supplier andbetween Republicans and Democrats is leading to
customer. The U.S. lost its lead in batteries 30our economic decline. We no longer have rational
years ago when it stopped makingdebate; rather we have two demagogic
consumer-electronics devices. Those companiesmonologues with no positive interaction leading to
producing batteries then gained the exposure andinaction. As Martin Luther King III has said, "We
relationships needed to learn to supply batteriesneed to learn how to disagree without being
for the more demanding laptop PC market, anddisagreeable." Perhaps with a civil political discourse
following that, for the even more demandingas in past times in the US, and with business
automobile market. U.S. companies didn'tviewing the long term consequences of their
participate in the first phase of production andactions, we can begin to realize a political and
consequently weren't competitive for all thatbusiness view to the future that will rebuild our
followed. Any attempts by US companies now toonce great US economy.
gain entry to that market will prove very