Regionalization of Biotech Investments the Only Hope for Africa

Should Africa regionalize biotechnologyCross-border partnership in biotechnology is critical,
investment? This is one of the key issues in theif success is to be realized in this field. Prof.
draft report on the future of biotechnology inCalestous Juma, the chair of this biotechnology
Africa, prepared by a panel of eminent Africanpanel, has made it very clear that the proposal's
scientists and policy makers.sole mission is to cluster biotech investments in
The panel, set up by the Africa Union and theregions where Return on Investment (ROI) will be
New Partnership for Africa's Developmenthigh. Such biotechnology investments will also be
(Nepad), has "proposed a key biotechnologytailored to meeting immediate and/or long-term
mission for each of Africa's regions, where suchneeds of the regions where they'll be located.
investments will have the largest potential toThe proposal is clear that countries would not be
boost development and nurture excellence." Thedenied opportunities to indulge in their own
panel would like genetic engineering projects to bebiotechnology investments. "[The proposals are]
stations in regions where they can benefit thenot saying that we shouldn't put money into crops
public most.in Southern Africa. It's just saying that, from the
This proposal envisages, for instance,way we look at it, HIV/AIDS is a critical issue in
concentrating HIV/AIDS-related biotechnologythis region, so it can be taken up as a key area
research in sub-Saharan Africa, where infectionsof investment for biotech," explains Aggrey
remain astronomically high.Ambali, coordinator of the Nepad African
The proposal has aroused controversy - anBiosciences Initiative.
unnecessary one - to the extent that someAll scientists of goodwill, are better advised to
countries are considering torpedoing it. Thesesupport this proposal. Biotechnology-related
countries fear being starved ofcenters of excellence stand to hasten the
biotechnology-related research funds, because, ifintegration of genetically modified crops and other
the proposal is implemented, they argue, attentionbiotech products into Africa's economy. Africa will
will henceforth focus on consensually agreedbe able to produce its own genetically modified
centers of excellence.food to feed the ever increasing population.
Such fears are misplaced and selfish, to say theAs it stands now, biotechnology research in Africa
least. For Biotechnology research to benefitis uncoordinated. We have briefcase biotechnology
Africa, there has to be centers of excellence,experts who are only good at writing proposals
where scientists from across the continent willfor projects that are never completed. It's a case
jointly conduct research that's beneficial to theof one hand not knowing what the other is doing.
African situation.This is unfortunate.
The proposal's critics are reading mischief whereTime has come for Africa to change its attitude
there is none. They are construing regionalizationtowards biotechnology. The first step in doing this
to mean zoning. I would not be surprised thatis to support the proposed regionalization of
these are the same people who have messed upbiotechnology investment. Once this is done,
the drive to assimilate genetically modified cropsAfrica's agriculture and health sectors will realize
into Africa's agriculture.tremendous growth.