Biotechnology - A Genetic Pandora's Box

The biotech industry has experienced explosiveorganisms are a new life form that can mutate
growth, dwarfing that of the high tech industry.and breed for generations with other living things.
It's driven by two factors - the curiosity of itsIt is a non-indigenous species that has absolutely
scientists and the payoff. The profits to be madeno natural habitat outside the laboratory. Their
are enormous, and it's these profits that areintroductions will most certainly set off elements
blinding its proponents and driving the debate.of the environment that have a domino effect of
It all started back in 1995 with the modification ofcascading changes throughout the entire
the humble tomato. But what a Pandora's Box iteco-system.
opened. Today we see many varieties of"If something does go badly wrong we will be
genetically altered produce which, though it looksfaced with the problem of clearing up a kind of
the same on the outside, is very unique in itspollution which is self-perpetuating. I am not
genetic make-up. This practice of creatingconvinced that anyone has the first idea of how
designer foods through gene manipulation is seenthis could be done, or indeed who would have to
as the exiting future in agricultural farming.pay." - Prince Charles, Seeds of Disaster, The
Geneticists tell us breathlessly that this newDaily Telegraph, 8 June 1998
technology will revolutionize our lives and lead toHere are a few examples of agricultural genetic
electrifying advances in the food industry. Somefailures illustrating some of the problems that
of the supposed benefits of this gene-manipulationhave been encountered:o The Flavr Savr tomato
are:o Foods more tolerant to chemicals &was a commercial disastero Bt-cotton suffered
better resistance to pests & diseaseso Moreextensive damage from Bt-resistance pestso
nutritional content and improved food processingRoundup Cotton shed its cotton balls when
traitso Resistance to unfavorable soils andsprayed with Roundupo A soybean with a Brazil
weather circumstanceso Improved ripening,nut gene contains a protein fatal to those with nut
texture and flavor in foodsallergyo Genetically modified potatoes damaged
But Is It Safe?the immune system in ratso Transgenic canola
Although the technology is impressive, thecan harm bees by destroying their ability to
question of food safety remains skeptical andrecognize flower perfumes
claims illusory. Genetic engineering is only in itsThese are but a few samples taken from known
infancy and scientists have no idea what they'reexamples. There may be many more that we
messing with. By inserting genes to alter designdon't know about because latent genetic
and content, they intervene in DNA which is aabnormalities have not yet surfaced. It takes only
self-organizing, self-replicating macromolecule, withone rogue gene to cause a disaster. Biotechnology
the ability to perform error correction.offers no benefits to the public or to the
Introduction of an alien gene introduces instability.environment, only to the biotech companies which
The stress will cause the molecule to try andhope to make a killing. It may be a bigger killing
expel, or mutate the alien gene, with the resultthan they anticipated. Using genetically modified
being a new structure, and the possibility of grosscrops is the same as conducting a gigantic
malfunction. This instability or undesiredexperiment on the world's ecosystem. But with
characteristic may not become apparent forthis experimentation, the ultimate price could be
several generations.life itself.
At this point in time, Agriculture Canada and the"My worry is that other advances in science may
USDA have not identified long term health risks.result in other means of mass destruction, maybe
All testing done to date, despite reassurances tomore readily available even than nuclear weapons.
the contrary by the biotech industry andGenetic engineering is quite a possible area,
regulatory authorities, are construed to safeguardbecause of these dreadful developments that are
the industry not guarantee public safety. Standardtaking place there." - Joseph Rotblat, Nobel Prize
toxicology tests are conducted by the industryLaureate.
that benefits, no testing is done by regulatorySources:
authorities (they rely on industry data), no1) Allen, Scott - Tinkering with DNA on Your
independent scientific tests, no long term studies,Dinner Plate - New York Times Syndicate, 1999
no sixth, seventh, eighth and later generation2) Alison Abbot, German Physicians Warn of
studies, and no monitoring of releases to theGenetics Risks, Nature, Vol 384 No 9, 1997
environment. In other words, testing is grossly3) Andy Coghlan, The Devil We Don't Know -
one-sided. The only meaningful trials taking placeVirus Resistance Is What Keeps Genetic
are those that use the human population asEngineers Awake At Night, New Scientist, 12
involuntary guinea-pigs and the environment as anSeptember 1996
outside laboratory.4) Anon, Gene Food Row, News in Brief, the
The biotech industry specializes in half-truths,Sunday Times, 16 August 1998
downright deceptions, and extravagant claims. It5) Anon, Battle Lines Drawn Over Labeling of
comes as no surprise to learn that companies bigGenetically Engineered Foods, Campaigns &
in the manufacture and distributions of biocidesNews, the Ecologist, July/August 1998
(e.g. Monsanto) are also major biotech players. Nor6) Ambassador College Agricultural Department -
should it come as a surprise that intense lobbyingGenetic Engineering, Complex Path To Failure -
by the same companies has led to a massiveYour Living Environment, May 1970/73,Vol.1,No.5.
increase in the permitted herbicide residues on7) Asda, Labeling of Genetically Modified
crops. GM crops can tolerate increased herbicideIngredients, Asda, 28 January 1998
applications, thus leading to a substantial increase8) BBC, News Item On Genetically Modified Food,
in usage.The World at One, Radio 4, BBC, 10 August 1998
So we can easily see that biotechnology, rather9) BBC, Report on Virulent and Cross-Species
than being used to solve agricultural problems, isViruses, Frontiers, Radio 4, BBC, 24 February
more profit driven than need driven. It intensifies1999
the farmers' dependence upon industrial inputs to10) BBC, Report on GM Crops, One Planet, BBC
legally inhibit the right of farmers to reproduce,World Service, BBC, 16 December 1998 11) Clive
share and store seeds. By controlling theCookson, Field of Genes, Financial Times, 11
germplasm from seed to sale and by forcingAugust 1998
farmers to pay inflated prices for seed-chemical12) Cummins, E.Joseph - More On Tinkered Genes
packages, companies are determined to extract- Alive, Canadian Journal of Health &
the most profit from their investment.Nutrition,Issue 3,p.135,1993.
Opinion polls show the world public to be13) FDA, Center for Food Safety & Applied
overwhelmingly against genetically modified foods.Nutrition-Emerging Technologies - Biotechnology,
In France, Britain, Denmark, USA and countries of1995
Europe, between 68-90% of all surveyed were14) FDA/CFSAN, Fed.Register - Statement of
dogmatically against the use of GM products. ThePolicy: Foods Derived from New Plant Varieties -
giant chemical companies are well aware of thisVol.57, No.104, p.22984-22989, May 29, 1992.
dilemma.15) Food Labeling; Foods Derived from New
(There is substantial opposition from the public,Varieties, Federal Register, April 28, 1993, Vol. 58
from the media, and not least, from retailers) -pages 25837-25841
Leaked internal Monsanto report.Hsu, Karen - The Future Of Food Is Now - New
Yet we'll likely continue to dine on DNA alteredYork Times Syndicate, 1999.
cuisine without ever knowing it. Peddlers of16) Kendall, Patricia-Food Biotech.: Boon or
genetically modified foods continue to slip theirThreat-Journal of Nutr. Education, 1997 - Society
adulterated products onto the world market in thefor Nutrit.Education.
hope that no one will notice. Producers deliberately17) McCullum,Christine - The New Biotechnology
mix GM and non-GM products in their foods, whichEra: Issues for Education and Policy - Journal of
amounts to force-feeding an unsuspecting public.Nutrition Education and Policy, May/June
How many people in Canada know they're eating1997-Society for Nutritional Education.
an estimated diet of 60% genetically processed18) P. Hatchwell, Opening Pandora's Box - The
foods? How many know that the US, Canada andRisks of Releasing Genetically Engineered
Argentina account for more than 90% of theOrganisms, the Ecologist, July/August 1989
world's GM food crops? Absence of food labeling19) Reuters - Fooling With Mother Nature -
helps tremendously in this growing market (as itCopyright 1998 ABC News
does with irradiated food).20) Reuters - Suit Warns of Food Risks -
[Labeling is the key issue ... If you put a label onCopyright 1998 ABC News.
genetically engineered food; you might as well put21) Staunton, Dennis & Others - GM Food
a skull and crossbones on it. - head of Asgrow,Threatens The Planet - Guardian Newspapers Ltd.,
Monsanto seed subsidiary].1999.
More genetic danger22) Steve Gorelick, Hiding Damaging Information
What about ecological balance? Modified cropFrom The Public, The Ecologist, Sept./Oct. 1998
genes could cross-pollinate into the countryside,23) Wales, Prince Of - Genetically Modified Food:
destroying wild habitats and creating a geneticallyIs It An Innovation We Can Do Without? - Online
polluted environment. Once released, geneticForum, Copyright St. James Place and the Press
material can never be retrieved again. TheseAssociation Ltd.