A Strong Patent Is Important To Halt Infringer's Operations, Says U.S. Supreme Court

Chemical, pharmaceutical, and biotechnologycourt should automatically issue an order to halt
companies and inventors spend countless numberthe infringer's operations if the patent owner
of hours and a lot of money to come up with aproved that his valid patent is unlawfully copied.
drug for curing killer diseases like cancer orTo succeed in halting the operations of the
diabetes or a new catalyst that will speed up ainfringer, the Supreme Court indicated that the
chemical reaction towards making a wonderpatent owner must show that it has suffered
plastic. They protect their inventions by securing abeyond repair by the actions of the infringer; that
patent.there is no other remedy, such as money, than
For one reason or another, the patent ownerstopping the infringer; how its hardship outweighs
may not be ready to make or sell the patentedthe hardship of the infringer; and that public
invention. The patent owner, for example,interest would not be harmed by halting the
University or individual inventor, may be thinkinginfringer. This is commonly called the "four-factor
of licensing the invention to another who cantest".
market the invention, and collect royaltyIn proving that the forces are working in the
payments rather than undertake efforts topatent owner's favor, as required by the
secure financing necessary to bring their works toSupreme Court, one of the questions that would
market themselves. However, much to thecome up is how strong the patent is - i.e., can it
patent owner's surprise and anger, it may noticesurvive an attack on its validity. In the words of
an infringer illegally making and selling the invention.Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing on the eBay
Can the patent owner go and automatically getcase, "the potential vagueness and suspect validity
an order to halt the infringer's operations? Theof ... the patents may affect the calculus under
answer may be surprising. The courts are notthe four-factor test."
always sympathetic to the patent owner.Securing a strong patent is not trivial. It is
In the recently decided fight between internetimportant that patent is filed promptly. For
giant eBay and smaller company Mercexchange,example, if the patent is filed long after the
who owned a patent for doing business on theinvention was published in a magazine or displayed
web, Justice Clarence Thomas, speaking for theas a poster, its validity or vitality comes into
United States Supreme Court, ruled that thequestion. Or the patent may have been filed
patent owner, besides showing that the patentpromptly but the patent may have been drafted
has been violated, must prove that a number ofthe patent such that the patent does not cover
things are lining up in its favor before it can stopthe invention adequately. To succeed in stopping
the infringer from copying the patented invention.the infringer, or to obtain a sizable royalty or
This is a dramatic departure from the earliersettlement from the infringer, it is essential that
lower court ruling that, except in rare situations, athe patent is strong and robust.